[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0804211224380.18530@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 12:25:17 -0400 (EDT)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
cc: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>, suresh.b.siddha@...el.com,
chinang.ma@...el.com, arjan@...ux.intel.com, willy@...ux.intel.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sched: push rt tasks only if newly activated tasks
have been added
On Mon, 21 Apr 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> got a build failure:
>
> In file included from kernel/sched.c:1972:
> kernel/sched_rt.c: In function 'enqueue_task_rt':
> kernel/sched_rt.c:522: error: 'struct rt_rq' has no member named 'pushed'
>
> with this config:
>
> http://redhat.com/~mingo/misc/config-Mon_Apr_21_18_02_45_CEST_2008.bad
>
> with the patch below against sched-devel/latest.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> ---
> kernel/sched.c | 2 ++
> kernel/sched_rt.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
> 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux/kernel/sched.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/kernel/sched.c
> +++ linux/kernel/sched.c
> @@ -462,6 +462,7 @@ struct rt_rq {
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> unsigned long rt_nr_migratory;
> int overloaded;
> + int pushed;
> #endif
> int rt_throttled;
> u64 rt_time;
> @@ -8073,6 +8074,7 @@ static void init_rt_rq(struct rt_rq *rt_
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> rt_rq->rt_nr_migratory = 0;
> rt_rq->overloaded = 0;
> + rt_rq->pushed = 0;
> #endif
>
> rt_rq->rt_time = 0;
> Index: linux/kernel/sched_rt.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/kernel/sched_rt.c
> +++ linux/kernel/sched_rt.c
> @@ -514,6 +514,13 @@ static void enqueue_task_rt(struct rq *r
> for_each_sched_rt_entity(rt_se)
> enqueue_rt_entity(rt_se);
>
> + /*
> + * Clear the "pushed" state since we have changed the run-queue and
> + * may need to migrate some of these tasks (see push_rt_tasks() for
> + * details)
> + */
> + rq->rt.pushed = 0;
> +
I'm betting that this needs a CONFIG_SMP around it.
-- Steve
> inc_cpu_load(rq, p->se.load.weight);
> }
>
> @@ -913,7 +920,7 @@ static int push_rt_task(struct rq *rq)
> int ret = 0;
> int paranoid = RT_MAX_TRIES;
>
> - if (!rq->rt.overloaded)
> + if (!rq->rt.overloaded || rq->rt.pushed)
> return 0;
>
> next_task = pick_next_highest_task_rt(rq, -1);
> @@ -973,6 +980,15 @@ out:
> }
>
> /*
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists