[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080422083810.GA23540@uranus.ravnborg.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 10:38:10 +0200
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
npiggin@...e.de, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/11] x86: convert to generic helpers for IPI function calls
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 09:57:28AM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> This converts x86 and x86-64 to use the new helpers for
> smp_call_function() and friends, and adds support for
> smp_call_function_single().
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> index 87a693c..aab97e3 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> @@ -156,6 +156,11 @@ config GENERIC_PENDING_IRQ
> depends on GENERIC_HARDIRQS && SMP
> default y
>
> +config GENERIC_SMP_HELPERS
> + bool
> + depends on SMP
> + default y
> +
Hi Jens.
[Not x86 specific - it was the first patch
touching a Kconfig file]
Could we define a single config variable
in for example kernel/Kconfig(*)
like this:
config HAVE_GENERIC_SMP_HELPERS
def_bool n
And then the archs that uses the generic SMP helpers just
do a simple:
config X86
+ select HAVE_GENERIC_SMP_HELPERS
This is the recommended method today and is documented
in Documentation/kbuild/kconfig-language.txt if
you need a bit more intro.
(*) I know we do not have kernel/Kconfig today.
But maybe this is a good time to add it and
source it from arch/Kconfig
Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists