[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1208860018.4620.100.camel@moss.renham>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 20:26:57 +1000
From: Ben Nizette <bn@...sdigital.com>
To: Uwe Kleine-König <Uwe.Kleine-Koenig@...i.com>
Cc: "Hans J. Koch" <hjk@...utronix.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] UIO: generic platform driver
On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 11:52 +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <Uwe.Kleine-Koenig@...i.com>
> ---
> Hello,
>
> This is the former patch 4/4 after some discussion.
>
> Open issues:
> - clock name "uio" isn't considered good by Russell King
> I don't have a better suggestion
I'd suggest it should be passed through from the platform code: only it
knows what it's going to be (and if indeed there's going to be one at
all). In fact, the lack-of-clock at the moment is fatal; it shouldn't
be IMO. For example, I don't need one in SMX.
> - some code could be shared with uio_smx.c
> I would address that in a seperate patch after this one hits mainline.
As I said before I'd prefer to keep my driver separate and standalone,
but you and HJK have expressed a wish for unification. If I get this
formally I'll consider myself outvoted and submit a patch to unify it
all when I submit my platform code (soon).
--Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists