linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] UIO: generic platform driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 22 Apr 2008 15:35:55 +0200
From:	"Hans J. Koch" <hjk@...utronix.de>
To:	Ben Nizette <bn@...sdigital.com>
Cc:	Uwe Kleine-K?nig <Uwe.Kleine-Koenig@...i.com>,
	"Hans J. Koch" <hjk@...utronix.de>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] UIO: generic platform driver

On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 08:26:57PM +1000, Ben Nizette wrote:
> 
> >   - some code could be shared with uio_smx.c
> >     I would address that in a seperate patch after this one hits mainline.
> 
> As I said before I'd prefer to keep my driver separate and standalone,
> but you and HJK have expressed a wish for unification.

This seems to be a misunderstanding. Actually, I don't care too much. If
you like to keep your driver standalone, I don't have objections, even
if Uwe's generic driver is merged. I think there are still valid reasons
not to reduce a driver to a platform data struct.

Greg, what do you say to that?

Thanks,
Hans

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/