linux-kernel - Re: x86: 4kstacks default

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200804221551.11488.vda.linux@googlemail.com>
Date:	Tue, 22 Apr 2008 15:51:11 +0200
From:	Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>
To:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
Cc:	David Chinner <dgc@....com>, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...deen.net>,
	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Shawn Bohrer <shawn.bohrer@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: x86: 4kstacks default

On Tuesday 22 April 2008 15:01, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Sent a few.
> > I would like to ask you to ACK/NAK every individual patch
> > in some reasonable period of time, say, 1-3 days. If you NAK a patch,
> > please let me know what is wrong with it.
> >...
> 
> I know the feeling of resending patches again and again without any 
> reaction quite well, but that's not David's fault and not true for XFS 
> patches, so when you try to put pressure on him you hit the wrong 
> person.

Yeah, sorry about that. I was not implying that XFS people were
not responsive.
--
vda
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/