[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <12c511ca0804220916i5c181202pecf8fee7153e54fc@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 09:16:49 -0700
From: "Tony Luck" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: "Mike Travis" <travis@....com>
Cc: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/12] sched: Remove fixed NR_CPUS sized arrays in kernel_sched_c v2
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 6:11 PM, Mike Travis <travis@....com> wrote:
> @@ -7297,6 +7287,11 @@ void __init sched_init_smp(void)
> #else
> void __init sched_init_smp(void)
> {
> +#if defined(CONFIG_NUMA)
> + sched_group_nodes_bycpu = kzalloc(nr_cpu_ids * sizeof(void **),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + BUG_ON(sched_group_nodes_bycpu == NULL);
> +#endif
> sched_init_granularity();
> }
> #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
This hunk is causing problems with one of my builds (generic,
uniprocessor). Note
that the #else at the start of this hunk is from a #ifdef CONFIG_SMP ... so I'm
wondering why we need #if defined(CONFIG_NUMA) inside uniprocessor code :-)
How can you have NUMA issues with only one cpu!!!
[I'm also wondering why the config that has the compile problem has CONFIG_SMP=n
and CONFIG_NUMA=y ... but that weirdness exposed this silliness, so
perhaps it isn't
all bad]
Error message is:
kernel/sched.c: In function `sched_init_smp':
kernel/sched.c:7994: error: `sched_group_nodes_bycpu' undeclared
(first use in this function)
kernel/sched.c:7994: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
kernel/sched.c:7994: error: for each function it appears in.)
-Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists