[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200804221817.03945.vda.linux@googlemail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 18:17:03 +0200
From: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
Cc: David Chinner <dgc@....com>, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...deen.net>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Shawn Bohrer <shawn.bohrer@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: #define out unused parameters of xfs_bmap_add_free and xfs_btree_read_bufl
On Tuesday 22 April 2008 16:28, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > xfs_bmap_add_free and xfs_btree_read_bufl functions
> > use some of their parameters only in some cases
> > (e.g. if DEBUG is defined, or on non-Linux OS :)
> >
> > This patch removes these parameters using #define hack
> > which makes them "disappear" without the need of uglifying
> > every callsite with #ifdefs.
> >
> > Code size difference on 32-bit x86:
> > 393457 2904 2952 399313 617d1 linux-2.6-xfs6-TEST/fs/xfs/xfs.o
> > 393441 2904 2952 399297 617c1 linux-2.6-xfs7-TEST/fs/xfs/xfs.o
> >...
>
> Elimination of completely unused parameters makes sense, but IMHO using
> such #define hacks for minuscule code size and stack usage advantages is
> not worth it.
In busybox this trick is used extensively.
I don't know how to eliminate these unused parameters with less
intervention, but I also don't want to leave it unfixed.
I want to eventually reach the state with no warnings
about unused parameters.
--
vda
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists