[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080422142807.GD16895@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 17:28:07 +0300
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
To: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>
Cc: David Chinner <dgc@....com>, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...deen.net>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Shawn Bohrer <shawn.bohrer@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: #define out unused parameters of
xfs_bmap_add_free and xfs_btree_read_bufl
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 01:20:54PM +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> xfs_bmap_add_free and xfs_btree_read_bufl functions
> use some of their parameters only in some cases
> (e.g. if DEBUG is defined, or on non-Linux OS :)
>
> This patch removes these parameters using #define hack
> which makes them "disappear" without the need of uglifying
> every callsite with #ifdefs.
>
> Code size difference on 32-bit x86:
> 393457 2904 2952 399313 617d1 linux-2.6-xfs6-TEST/fs/xfs/xfs.o
> 393441 2904 2952 399297 617c1 linux-2.6-xfs7-TEST/fs/xfs/xfs.o
>...
Elimination of completely unused parameters makes sense, but IMHO using
such #define hacks for minuscule code size and stack usage advantages is
not worth it.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists