[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080422182830.GD28933@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 21:28:30 +0300
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
To: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...deen.net>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: #define out unused parameters
of?xfs_bmap_add_free and xfs_btree_read_bufl
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 07:50:54PM +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> On Tuesday 22 April 2008 19:26, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> > >> I want to eventually reach the state with no warnings
> > >> about unused parameters.
> > >
> > > The standard kernel pattern in using empty static inline functions (that
> > > allow type checking).
> > >
> > > And I'm not sure whether the number of functions you'd have to change
> > > for reaching your goal has four, five or six digits.
> >
> > It would be a huge undertaking.
> >
> > Just building xfs w/ the warning in place exposes tons of unused
> > parameter warnings from outside xfs as well.
>
> Eh... I meant "no warnings about unused parameters" for fs/xfs/* only,
> not for the entire kernel. I filter out other warnings.
>
> I want to do it not as an excercise in perfectionism,
> but as means of making sure we do not waste stack
> passing useless parameters, which is important for xfs.
That's not really maintainable, and the stack gains are too small for
bringing us significantely nearer to a solution.
> vda
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists