[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200804222132.38169.vda.linux@googlemail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 21:32:38 +0200
From: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...deen.net>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: #define out unused parameters of?xfs_bmap_add_free and xfs_btree_read_bufl
On Tuesday 22 April 2008 20:28, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Eh... I meant "no warnings about unused parameters" for fs/xfs/* only,
> > not for the entire kernel. I filter out other warnings.
> >
> > I want to do it not as an excercise in perfectionism,
> > but as means of making sure we do not waste stack
> > passing useless parameters, which is important for xfs.
>
> That's not really maintainable,
Why? Adding -Wunused -Wunused-parameter in fs/xfs/Makefile:
EXTRA_CFLAGS += -I$(src) -I$(src)/linux-2.6 -funsigned-char
#EXTRA_CFLAGS += -Wunused -Wunused-parameter
and making a test build with it uncommented once in a while
will reveal a bit of fallout, which is then fixed.
busybox source is thrice as big as xfs source
and from the experience I'd say it's not difficult
to keep it in shape.
> and the stack gains are too small for
> bringing us significantely nearer to a solution.
I promise to take a look at the critical (wrt stack use) path next.
--
vda
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists