lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 01:05:05 -0700 From: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com> To: Henry Nestler <henry-20071123@...or.de> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86: Further shrink ifdef sections in fault.c On Wed, 2008-04-23 at 02:41 +0200, Henry Nestler wrote: > Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com> wrote: > > > >> + if (!(address >= VMALLOC_START && address < VMALLOC_END)) > >> + return -1; > > > > ah, this explains the weird chunk in your other patch. > > Why this is not in x86_32? > > Please see my other mail "x86: endless page faults in mount_block_root > for Linux 2.6" > Hmm, no idea why it wasn't in the 32-bit version. Looks like something fixed in the 64 bit versions but not 32-bit. See: commit 3b9ba4d5e23fcab24dd4d2e46dce11f5863869b4 commit f95190b28daa1bebf78ab5ec4129d01a223982c5 Cheers, Harvey -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists