[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080424015814.GA17190@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 07:28:14 +0530
From: Dhaval Giani <dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, mingo@...e.hu, vatsa@...ibm.com,
dmitry.adamushko@...il.com, efault@....de,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] sched: higher granularity load on 64bit
systems
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 05:27:10PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
> Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 00:07:56 +0200
>
> > The below is an RFC because for some reason it regresses kbuild by 5% on
> > my machine (and more on the largesmp that are the reason for it).
>
> This causes my 64-cpu Niagara2 box to completely hang when I run "make
> clean" on a kernel tree after a fresh bootup.
>
Any traces? Or anything? It stayed pretty stable on the 128 way I trying
on, (but for the performance regression) and I was able to reproduce
your group scheduler hang (or so i think, it might a separate one
altogether.)
> Can we just revert all of this broken code until it's sorted out? :-/
>
> We're going on 4 days with unfixed major regressions from the
> scheduler tree merge, and these regressions make systems unusable.
>
> This is blocking my own work, and I'm starting to lose my patience.
--
regards,
Dhaval
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists