[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080423.172710.152976766.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 17:27:10 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl
Cc: mingo@...e.hu, dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, vatsa@...ibm.com,
dmitry.adamushko@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
efault@....de
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] sched: higher granularity load on 64bit
systems
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 00:07:56 +0200
> The below is an RFC because for some reason it regresses kbuild by 5% on
> my machine (and more on the largesmp that are the reason for it).
This causes my 64-cpu Niagara2 box to completely hang when I run "make
clean" on a kernel tree after a fresh bootup.
Can we just revert all of this broken code until it's sorted out? :-/
We're going on 4 days with unfixed major regressions from the
scheduler tree merge, and these regressions make systems unusable.
This is blocking my own work, and I'm starting to lose my patience.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists