[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1209059717.12718.32.camel@nimitz.home.sr71.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 10:55:17 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc: viro@...IV.linux.org.uk, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, ezk@...sunysb.edu,
mhalcrow@...ibm.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 00/13] vfs: add helpers to check r/o bind mounts
On Thu, 2008-04-24 at 17:37 +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> Why are those so important? Yes, if we have multiple vfs_() calls,
> surround them with an extra want/drop pair. We do already do multiple
> overlapping want/drop pairs with O_TRUNC and O_CREAT (AFAIR).
The one that I remember is the pair that we take for O_CREAT and the
nameidata_to_filp() in do_filp_open() that we do on it after the
creation and hold while the file is open.
The only reason for this one is that we want to shut down a potential
race that would allow the file to be created, then still return a -EROFS
because someone did a r/w->r/o transition between the create an the
nameidata_to_filp().
We could pass some information into nameidata_to_filp()->__dentry_open()
telling it that we already have a write and it doesn't need to take one,
but I think having the two nested writes is cleaner.
Is that the case you're thinking of?
-- Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists