| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 08:47:20 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> Cc: mingo@...e.hu, dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, vatsa@...ibm.com, dmitry.adamushko@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, efault@....de Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] sched: higher granularity load on 64bit systems On Wed, 2008-04-23 at 17:27 -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> > Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 00:07:56 +0200 > > > The below is an RFC because for some reason it regresses kbuild by 5% on > > my machine (and more on the largesmp that are the reason for it). > > This causes my 64-cpu Niagara2 box to completely hang when I run "make > clean" on a kernel tree after a fresh bootup. > > Can we just revert all of this broken code until it's sorted out? :-/ > > We're going on 4 days with unfixed major regressions from the > scheduler tree merge, and these regressions make systems unusable. > > This is blocking my own work, and I'm starting to lose my patience. Yes, this is all rather embarassing - if you want a revert of the offending patches I can spin you one, and if this isn't solved quickly I'm afraid we'll indeed have to revert in -linus :-/ Sorry about this. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists