[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1209019640.7115.345.camel@twins>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 08:47:20 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: mingo@...e.hu, dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, vatsa@...ibm.com,
dmitry.adamushko@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
efault@....de
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] sched: higher granularity load on 64bit
systems
On Wed, 2008-04-23 at 17:27 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
> Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 00:07:56 +0200
>
> > The below is an RFC because for some reason it regresses kbuild by 5% on
> > my machine (and more on the largesmp that are the reason for it).
>
> This causes my 64-cpu Niagara2 box to completely hang when I run "make
> clean" on a kernel tree after a fresh bootup.
>
> Can we just revert all of this broken code until it's sorted out? :-/
>
> We're going on 4 days with unfixed major regressions from the
> scheduler tree merge, and these regressions make systems unusable.
>
> This is blocking my own work, and I'm starting to lose my patience.
Yes, this is all rather embarassing - if you want a revert of the
offending patches I can spin you one, and if this isn't solved quickly
I'm afraid we'll indeed have to revert in -linus :-/
Sorry about this.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists