linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] Skip I/O merges when disabled

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 25 Apr 2008 07:17:15 -0400
From:	"Alan D. Brunelle" <Alan.Brunelle@...com>
To:	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] Skip I/O merges when disabled

>>
>> I'll look into retaining the one-hit cache merge functionality, remove
>> the errant elv_rqhas_del code, and repost w/ the results from the other
>> tests I've run.
> 
> Also please do a check where you only disable the front merge logic, as
> that is the most expensive bit (and the least likely to occur). I would
> not be surprised if just removing the front merge bit would get you the
> majority of the gain already. I have in the past considered just getting
> rid of that bit, as it rarely triggers and it is a costly rbtree lookup
> for each IO. The back merge lookup+merge should be cheaper, it's just a
> hash lookup.
> 

I have the results from leaving in just the one-hit cache merge
attempts, and started a run leaving in both that and the back-merge
rq_hash checks. (The patch below basically undoes patch 3/3 - putting
back in the addition of rqs onto the hash list, and moves the nomerges
check below the back merge attempts.)

We /could/ change the tunable to a dial (or a mask) - enabling/disabling
specific merge attempts, but that seems a bit confusing/complex.

Jens: What do you think?

Alan

View attachment "0005-Enables-back-merge-checks-and-one-hit-cache-checks.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (1486 bytes)