| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <48120ABF.1050802@aknet.ru> Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 20:45:51 +0400 From: Stas Sergeev <stsp@...et.ru> To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de> CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.25-mm1 (snd-pcsp doesn't like DEBUG_PAGEALLOC) Hello. Takashi Iwai wrote: > Yeah, of course. Don't mix up with the argument about Kconfig > dependency issues. I just reacted against your statement that input > pcspkr driver will be obsoleted. Those are the different ones of course. For me the dependancy issue is a primary problem of course, so the other one I simply ducked. > I actually removed the dependency from snd-pcsp Kconfig again since > this causes a dependency loop (at least, kbuild can't handle > properly). OK, good to know this. :) > But anyway, as mentioned in my previous post, snd-pcsp wouldn't be > enabled on most of distros' kernels because it cannot be built > together with input-pcspkr driver, unfortunately... Yes, making them to play well together is something to think about too. But I don't see how it can affect the distributors. If the distro doesn't have the sound enabled, then it won't enable snd-pcsp no matter what. If it does have the sound enabled, then why would it ever want to use pcspkr instead of snd-pcsp? I see this issue mostly as a theoretical one. If you see the real problems with the current situation, please let me know. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists