[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <481209F2.4050908@zytor.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 09:42:26 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
CC: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, zdenek.kabelac@...il.com,
rjw@...k.pl, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
penberg@...helsinki.fi, clameter@....com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pageexec@...email.hu,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86: fix text_poke
Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>
> Yes, the immediate values, in general, only need to do atomic writes,
> because I have taken care of placing the mov instruction in the correct
> alignment so its immediate value happens to be aligned in memory.
> However, the latest optimisation I did to change a conditional branch
> into a jump when the correct code pattern is detected :
>
> mov, test, bne short
> into a
> nop2, nop2, nop1, jmp short
>
> or
>
> mov, test, bne near
> into a
> nop2, nop2, nop1, jmp near
>
And how, pray tell, do you deal with the fact that:
a) the EFLAGS may be live on exit;
b) there might be a jump into the middle of this instruction sequence?
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists