linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.25-mm1 (snd-pcsp doesn't like DEBUG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <481213F3.3050006@aknet.ru>
Date:	Fri, 25 Apr 2008 21:25:07 +0400
From:	Stas Sergeev <stsp@...et.ru>
To:	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.25-mm1 (snd-pcsp doesn't like DEBUG_PAGEALLOC)

Hello.

Takashi Iwai wrote:
> The sound subsystem is enabled (loaded) only when necessary.
> As long as there are many systems without the sound subsystem
> (i.e. servers),
Is it really a problem for the server
admin to just tolerate a few extra modules
being loaded? I really don't know, I just
thought it is not.
Of course the one may not like the fact
that after the kernel update, he gets a
few modules more in lsmod output; someone
may even call it a bloat...
$ lsmod |wc -l
79
Doesn't look too small already. :)

Anyway, I guess we'll soon find out the
numbers, unless someone will come up with
the good way to make those drivers to
play better together and to not depend
on each other, which looks a bit difficult
from the first glance.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/