| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20080425140448.ZZRA012@mailhub.coreip.homeip.net> Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 14:09:29 -0400 From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com> To: Stas Sergeev <stsp@...et.ru> Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.25-mm1 (snd-pcsp doesn't like DEBUG_PAGEALLOC) Hi Stas, On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 08:45:51PM +0400, Stas Sergeev wrote: > Hello. > > Takashi Iwai wrote: > > > But anyway, as mentioned in my previous post, snd-pcsp wouldn't be > > enabled on most of distros' kernels because it cannot be built > > together with input-pcspkr driver, unfortunately... > Yes, making them to play well together is > something to think about too. But I don't > see how it can affect the distributors. > If the distro doesn't have the sound enabled, > then it won't enable snd-pcsp no matter > what. If it does have the sound enabled, > then why would it ever want to use pcspkr > instead of snd-pcsp? Given agerage quality of the speakers in the current boxes and abudance of on-board sound I doubt any distriution would want to have snd-pcsp enabled since there is a chance it may come up as a primary (default) sound device. At least my experience with F[C]7 that juggling 3 sound cards is not very easy. -- Dmitry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists