linux-kernel - Re: [SPARC64] INO problem Re: [Bug 10273] New: Sun GEM (PCI)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080425215905.0d21f5ca.seraph@xs4all.nl>
Date:	Fri, 25 Apr 2008 21:59:05 +0200
From:	Jos van der Ende <seraph@...all.nl>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	jarkao2@...il.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, bugme-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [SPARC64] INO problem Re: [Bug 10273] New: Sun GEM (PCI) -
 network device doesn't work

> Please give this patch a try (this is against 2.6.23, which is the
> version you reported the bug against, let me know if another version
> is more convenient).

I applied the patch against 2.6.24-gentoo-r4, the current kernel on this machine. It worked fine, with only an offset of 12 lines. Nothing unusual during compile either.

The first results are hopeful: I am no longer able to trigger this bug by loading sym53c8xx before sungem, nor by having them both loaded by udev. Nothing odd in dmesg and the machine is completely functional.

I don't have much time for testing today, but if desired I will gladly do some more testing tomorrow or Sunday.

-- 
Jos van der Ende <seraph@...all.nl>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/