linux-kernel - Re: [SPARC64] INO problem Re: [Bug 10273] New: Sun GEM (PCI)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 25 Apr 2008 13:35:58 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	seraph@...all.nl
Cc:	jarkao2@...il.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, bugme-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [SPARC64] INO problem Re: [Bug 10273] New: Sun GEM (PCI) -
 network device doesn't work

From: Jos van der Ende <seraph@...all.nl>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 21:59:05 +0200

> > Please give this patch a try (this is against 2.6.23, which is the
> > version you reported the bug against, let me know if another version
> > is more convenient).
> 
> I applied the patch against 2.6.24-gentoo-r4, the current kernel on this machine. It worked fine, with only an offset of 12 lines. Nothing unusual during compile either.
> 
> The first results are hopeful: I am no longer able to trigger this bug by loading sym53c8xx before sungem, nor by having them both loaded by udev. Nothing odd in dmesg and the machine is completely functional.
> 
> 
> I don't have much time for testing today, but if desired I will gladly do some more testing tomorrow or Sunday.

Thanks for testing the change, I'll do some of my own testing and push
the bug fix upstream.

Thanks again!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/