linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] capabilities: implement per-process securebits

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080426081810.7f1245e7.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Sat, 26 Apr 2008 08:18:10 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	"Andrew G. Morgan" <morgan@...nel.org>
Cc:	Linux Security Modules List 
	<linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>,
	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] capabilities: implement per-process securebits

On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 18:25:37 -0800 "Andrew G. Morgan" <morgan@...nel.org> wrote:

> Here is the patch to add per-process securebits again. This version
> includes Serge's argument type fix (thanks), but is otherwise unchanged
> from the one posted a couple of weeks back. It is against Linus' tree as
> of a the 15th.

The hitherto-invisible-to-me PR_GET_TSC and PR_SET_TSC have turned up in
mainline, so I have renumbered your prctl options to

/* Get/set securebits (as per security/commoncap.c) */
#define PR_GET_SECUREBITS 27
#define PR_SET_SECUREBITS 28

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/