[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080426154123.GA7295@elte.hu>
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 17:41:23 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Gabriel C <nix.or.die@...glemail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
"Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>
Subject: Re: [git pull] x86 PAT changes
* Gabriel C <nix.or.die@...glemail.com> wrote:
> Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Gabriel C <nix.or.die@...glemail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Ingo,
> >>
> >> When using an 64bit ( didn't got time to test 32bit now ) kernel[1]
> >> with PAT enabled , kvm-intel does not work anymore.
> >>
> >> When modprobing kvm-intel , kvm is saying VT extension is disable by
> >> BIOS which isn't true. When disabling PAT again ( no changes to BIOS )
> >> kvm-intel works again here.
> >>
> >> Is that an known problem ?
> >
> > no, that side-effect was not known. Cc:-ed more folks.
>
> It seems like the update triggers some compiler bug.
>
> Setting CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=n fixed that btw.
>
> I don't have the time right now but later on today I will compile
> gcc43_svn_branch and test again with CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=y and see
> what I get.
>
> Ingo sorry for the noise.
no problem and it's not noise even if it turns out to be a compiler
problem - we very much want to know about them when they affect the
kernel.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists