linux-kernel - Re: [RFC git pull] "big box" x86 changes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080426192145.GA6853@elte.hu>
Date:	Sat, 26 Apr 2008 21:21:45 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Yinghai Lu <yinghai.lu@....com>,
	Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>, jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org
Subject: Re: [RFC git pull] "big box" x86 changes


* Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de> wrote:

> Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>       x86: fix k8-bus_64.c build
>
> Is it not necessary to fold this into a previous patch, to keep the tree 
> bisectable?

as i mentioned it i kept the tree as-is, to maintain its impression 
about its historic behavior. That way people can see how it behaved, 
what kind of breakages were observed, what time span the changes came 
in, etc. Those non-bisectable fixlets will be backmerged for a real pull 
request.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/