[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4813A84C.8070309@keyaccess.nl>
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 00:10:20 +0200
From: Rene Herman <rene.herman@...access.nl>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com>
CC: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Adam Belay <ambx1@....rr.com>,
Adam M Belay <abelay@....edu>,
Li Shaohua <shaohua.li@...el.com>,
Matthieu Castet <castet.matthieu@...e.fr>,
Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 38/54] PNP: remove PNP_MAX_* uses
On 25-04-08 20:38, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> +#define set(flags) ((flags & IORESOURCE_UNSET) == 0)
> +
> static ssize_t pnp_show_current_resources(struct device *dmdev,
> struct device_attribute *attr,
> char *buf)
> {
> struct pnp_dev *dev = to_pnp_dev(dmdev);
> + struct resource *res;
> int i, ret;
> pnp_info_buffer_t *buffer;
>
> @@ -267,50 +270,46 @@
> else
> pnp_printf(buffer, "disabled\n");
>
> - for (i = 0; i < PNP_MAX_PORT; i++) {
> - if (pnp_port_valid(dev, i)) {
> + for (i = 0; (res = pnp_get_resource(dev, IORESOURCE_IO, i)); i++) {
> + if (set(res->flags)) {
You've at this point already introduced the pnp_resource_valid() inline. Use
here maybe? (also other locations here)
Rene.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists