linux-kernel - Re: [RFC git pull] "big box" x86 changes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87bq3ww9ab.fsf@basil.nowhere.org>
Date:	Sun, 27 Apr 2008 00:17:32 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Yinghai Lu <yinghai.lu@....com>,
	Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>, jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org
Subject: Re: [RFC git pull] "big box" x86 changes

Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> writes:
>
> Most of the work has been done by Yinghai Lu who has gone through a 
> heroic effort to fix all the big-box bugs that he encountered on the 
> vanilla Linux kernel on his various up to 256 GB RAM test-systems. Also 
> work is included from Ying Huang for those insane SGI UV boxes.

Just to make things clear for the list readers, x86-64 worked fine for years 
on 256GB systems.

Many of the problems fixed in this tree are either relatively recent
regressions or have nothing to do with large boxes or 256GB (like the mmconfig
changes)

-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/