[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080427131516.GA8850@elte.hu>
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 15:15:16 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
Subject: Re: [patch] ftrace, v15
* KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> Hi Ingo,
>
> > the current/latest ftrace tree can be pulled from:
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mingo/linux-2.6-sched-devel.git
> >
> > the full diffs are too large to be included here, but the shortlog and
> > the diffstat is below. Not much changed in the fundamentals since the
> > last lkml posting - but many small details were refined.
>
> I hope ftrace people discussio LTTng people more. AFAIK nobody explain
> pros. and cons. ftrace against marker approach. (of cource, LTTng
> people doen't explain it too)
check the tree :-) It has these commits too:
Markers use imv jump
Linux Kernel Markers - Use Immediate Values
Markers - define non optimized marker
Markers - remove extra format argument
LTTng instrumentation net
LTTng instrumentation mm
LTTng instrumentation kernel
LTTng instrumentation ipc
LTTng instrumentation fs
[ the latter ones are only there for testing - Mathieu is working on a
different approach for syscall instrumentation. ]
Enjoy,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists