linux-kernel - Re: [patch] ftrace, v15

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 27 Apr 2008 20:14:26 +0900
From:	"KOSAKI Motohiro" <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To:	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	"Mathieu Desnoyers" <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
Subject: Re: [patch] ftrace, v15

Hi Ingo,

>  the current/latest ftrace tree can be pulled from:
>
>    git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mingo/linux-2.6-sched-devel.git
>
>  the full diffs are too large to be included here, but the shortlog and
>  the diffstat is below. Not much changed in the fundamentals since the
>  last lkml posting - but many small details were refined.

I hope ftrace people discussio LTTng people more.
AFAIK nobody explain pros. and cons. ftrace against marker approach.
(of cource, LTTng people doen't explain it too)

I believe tracing feature is very important.
too few discussion is sad ;-)

Why nobody try to integrate ftrace and LTTng?
and, Why don't you separate sched-devel tree and ftrace-devel tree?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/