| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 00:22:16 -0700 (PDT) From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> To: mingo@...e.hu Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rostedt@...dmis.org Subject: Re: [patch] ftrace, v15 From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 09:16:59 +0200 > * David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote: > > > You're getting sloppier and sloppier each and every bogus pull request > > you send out this week Ingo. > > this is not a pull request David ... > > > What is all of this non-ftrace crap in the shortlog? > > other changes in my tree ... Regardless of what it is, I'm getting really sick and tired of how you're doing development during this merge window and all of the completely bogus and unreviewed changes you are inserting into the tree at a freightening pace. Someone posting a patch to LkML and YOU applying the patch to your tree DOES NOT equal "reviewed"! If nobody has had a chance to review the patch, too bad. By jamming all of this stuff into Linus's tree, you are forcing poor souls like myself and Andrew Morton to watch over you like a small child. And that is totally unfair to those of us who have our own merging and development work to do. The code gets reviewed first, not after it's in the tree already. Your little "let's see how fast I can merge patches into the tree" experiment is coming at an enormous cost. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists