[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080428125141.GF27997@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:51:41 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Miao Xie <miaox@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: fair-group: fix a Div0 error of the fair group
scheduler
* Miao Xie <miaox@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> When I echoed 0 into the "cpu.shares" file, a Div0 error occured.
>
> We found it is caused by the following calling.
>
> sched_group_set_shares(tg, shares)
> set_se_shares(tg->se[i], shares/nr_cpu_ids)
> __set_se_shares(se, shares)
> div64_64((1ULL<<32), shares)
>
> When the echoed value was less than the number of processores, the
> result of the sentence "shares/nr_cpu_ids" was 0, and then the system
> called div64() to divide the result, the Div0 error occured.
>
> It is unnecessary that the shares value is divided by nr_cpu_ids, I
> think. Because in the function __update_group_shares_cpu() and
> init_tg_cfs_entry(), the shares value isn't divided by nr_cpu_ids when
> setting shares of the sched entity.
>
> This patch fixes this bug. And echoing ULONG_MAX value into cpu.shares
> also causes Div0 error, so we set a macro MAX_SHARES to limit the max
> value of shares.
thanks, applied.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists