linux-kernel - Re: [2.6 patch] fs/buffer.c:init

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0804280901130.3119@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Mon, 28 Apr 2008 09:01:42 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@...lshack.com>,
	jdike@...toit.com
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] fs/buffer.c:init_buffer() mustn't be inline



On Mon, 28 Apr 2008, Adrian Bunk wrote:
<
> This patch fixes the following build error with UML and gcc 4.3:
> 
> <--  snip  -->
> 
> ...
>   CC      fs/buffer.o
> /home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/git/linux-2.6/fs/buffer.c: In function ‘init_page_buffers’:
> /home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/git/linux-2.6/fs/buffer.c:51: sorry, unimplemented: inlining failed in call to ‘init_buffer’: function body not available
> /home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/git/linux-2.6/fs/buffer.c:1007: sorry, unimplemented: called from here
> make[2]: *** [fs/buffer.o] Error 1

Can somebody tell why this is not a gcc bug?

		Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/