linux-kernel - Re: [patch] pcspkr: fix dependancies

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <481626B6.5040207@aknet.ru>
Date:	Mon, 28 Apr 2008 23:34:14 +0400
From:	Stas Sergeev <stsp@...et.ru>
To:	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
CC:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
	Linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@...e.cz>,
	Michael Opdenacker <michael@...e-electrons.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [patch] pcspkr: fix dependancies

Hello.

Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> It looks like the change was introduced by commit
> 67926892ef7a7fbc76de607120d44416019fdf07
Indeed. But the log message
http://www.mail-archive.com/git-commits-head@vger.kernel.org/msg36026.html
doesn't seem to specify the reason
for the change, so this doesn't
clarify a thing, unfortunately.

> I think that we should register devices even if there is no driver in
> the kernel for it because driver may be compiled at later time or be out
> of tree. Adding patch author and other people that signed off the patch
> to CC...
Since there seem to be no objections,
would you mind adding the patch to your
git tree? Or who should that be?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/