[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aa79d98a0804290050i26300631kbb589eaa0c528088@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 11:50:15 +0400
From: "Cyrill Gorcunov" <gorcunov@...il.com>
To: "David Newall" <davidn@...idnewall.com>
Cc: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"Markus Metzger" <markus.t.metzger@...el.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: DS cleanup - dont treat 0 as NULL
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 10:23 AM, David Newall <davidn@...idnewall.com> wrote:
> Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> > - return 0;
> > + return NULL;
>
> Why? The constant 0 is C's official symbol for a null pointer.
>
Yes, but by using NULL explicilty allows you to separate _pointers_ from
numbers on review process. Or maybe you wanna drop NULL at all? I dont
think you will like that ;)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists