lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48167473.80207@googlemail.com>
Date:	Tue, 29 Apr 2008 03:05:55 +0200
From:	Gabriel C <nix.or.die@...glemail.com>
To:	Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
CC:	Mika Fischer <mika.fischer@...pnet.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jesse Barnes <jesse.barnes@...el.com>, balajirrao@...il.com,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_32: trim memory by updating e820 v3

Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 3:56 PM, Gabriel C <nix.or.die@...glemail.com> wrote:
>> Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>  > On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Gabriel C <nix.or.die@...glemail.com> wrote:
>>  >> Gabriel C wrote:
>>  >>  > Gabriel C wrote:
>>  >>  >> Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>  >>  >>> On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 7:24 AM, Gabriel C <nix.or.die@...glemail.com> wrote:
>>  >>  >>>> Mika Fischer wrote:
>>  >>  >>>>  > Hi Ingo,
>>  >>  >>>>  >
>>  >>  >>>>  > I'm having the same problem.
>>  >>  >>>>  >
>>  >>  >>>>  > Ingo Molnar schrieb:
>>  >>  >>>>  >> excellent. So just to make sure: this box never had proper graphics
>>  >>  >>>>  >> under Linux (under no previous kernel), due to the way the BIOS has set
>>  >>  >>>>  >> up the MTRR's, right?
>>  >>  >>>>  >
>>  >>  >>>>  > Well, not quite. X still works fine, but since the video memory is
>>  >>  >>>>  > overlapped by two of the existing MTRRs, X cannot add a write-combining
>>  >>  >>>>  > range for the video memory. That makes X rather slow especially if you
>>  >>  >>>>  > use DRI for Compiz etc.
>>  >>  >>>>
>>  >>  >>>>  Well you are lucky then :)
>>  >>  >>>>
>>  >>  >>>>  Yeah X 'worked' but it worked as slow as with vesa video driver here.
>>  >>  >>> [    0.000000] rangeX: 0000000000000000 - 00000000d0000000
>>  >>  >>> [    0.000000] Setting variable MTRR 0, base: 0MB, range: 2048MB, type WB
>>  >>  >>> [    0.000000] Setting variable MTRR 1, base: 2048MB, range: 1024MB, type WB
>>  >>  >>> [    0.000000] Setting variable MTRR 2, base: 3072MB, range: 256MB, type WB
>>  >>  >>> [    0.000000] range0: 00000000cf800000 - 00000000cf800000
>>  >>  >>> [    0.000000] range: 00000000cf800000 - 00000000d0000000
>>  >>  >>> [    0.000000] Setting variable MTRR 3, base: 3320MB, range: 8MB, type WB
>>  >>  >>> [    0.000000] range0: 0000000100000000 - 0000000120000000
>>  >>  >>> [    0.000000] Setting variable MTRR 4, base: 4096MB, range: 512MB, type WB
>>  >>  >>> [    0.000000] range: 0000000120000000 - 0000000130000000
>>  >>  >>> [    0.000000] Setting variable MTRR 5, base: 4608MB, range: 256MB, type WB
>>  >>  >>> [    0.000000] hole: 000000012c000000 - 0000000130000000
>>  >>  >>> [    0.000000] Setting variable MTRR 6, base: 4800MB, range: 64MB, type UC
>>  >>  >>>
>>  >>  >>> so your X server need two entries for WB?
>>  >>  >>>
>>  >>  >>> can you send out /proc/mtrr with booting with disable_mtrr_cleanup?
>>  >>  >> I can just not right now , cannot reboot the box yet. In about 1h or so , maybe less.
>>  >>  >
>>  >>  > Here the output with v3 which is disabled by default:
>>  >>  >
>>  >>  > --($:~)-- cat /proc/mtrr
>>  >>  > reg00: base=0xd0000000 (3328MB), size= 256MB: uncachable, count=1
>>  >>  > reg01: base=0xe0000000 (3584MB), size= 512MB: uncachable, count=1
>>  >>  > reg02: base=0x00000000 (   0MB), size=4096MB: write-back, count=1
>>  >>  > reg03: base=0x100000000 (4096MB), size= 512MB: write-back, count=1
>>  >>  > reg04: base=0x120000000 (4608MB), size= 128MB: write-back, count=1
>>  >>  > reg05: base=0x128000000 (4736MB), size=  64MB: write-back, count=1
>>  >>  > reg06: base=0xcf600000 (3318MB), size=   2MB: uncachable, count=1
>>  >>  >
>>  >>  > dmesg is saying now :
>>  >>  >
>>  >>  > [   22.764595] mtrr: type mismatch for d0000000,10000000 old: write-back new: write-combining
>>  >>  >
>>  >>  >
>>  >>  > My card settings in BIOS ( that was default ) are the following :
>>  >>  >
>>  >>  > DVMT Mode -> DVMT Mode ( possible setting DVMT Mode or Fixed Mode )
>>  >>  > DVMT / Memory -> 256MB ( possible settings 128/256 MB or Maximum DVMT )
>>  >>  >
>>  >>  > Initiate Graphics Adapter -> PEG/PCI ( possible settings IGD , PCI/IGD , PCI/PEG , PEG/IGD )
>>  >>  > Internal Graphics Mode Select -> Enabled,8MB ( possible settings Enabled,8MB , Enabled,1MB maybe Disabled I forgot to look)
>>  >>  > PEG Port -> Auto ( possible settings Auto , Disabled )
>>  >>  > PEG Port Force x1 -> Disabled ( possible settings Enabled , Disabled )
>>  >>  >
>>  >>  > Of course these settings are only possible when the card is not disabled :)
>>  >>  >
>>  >>  > I'm gonna try v4 now and enable it. Please let me know if you need more infos.
>>  >>
>>  >>  Hmm v4 doesn't work anymore here ( I've tested with all possible settings in BIOS ).
>>  >>  It takes 6 minutes to boot to :
>>  >>
>>  >
>>  > so you card is using 256M and 8M? 0xd0000000-0xe0000000, where is
>>  > another 8M address.
>>
>>  Looks like this , yes. Is using the 256MB Memory and the 8MB for Graphics Mode Select.
>>
>>  I'm not really sure why the 8MB are needed , BIOS book doesn't tell me.
>>  I could try to disable and see what I get =)
>>
>>
>>
>>  >
>>  > mtrr by BIOS is very interesting:
>>  > before
>>  >>  > reg02: base=0x00000000 (   0MB), size=4096MB: write-back, count=1
>>  >>  > reg06: base=0xcf600000 (3318MB), size=   2MB: uncachable, count=1
>>  >>  > reg00: base=0xd0000000 (3328MB), size= 256MB: uncachable, count=1
>>  >>  > reg01: base=0xe0000000 (3584MB), size= 512MB: uncachable, count=1
>>  >>  > reg03: base=0x100000000 (4096MB), size= 512MB: write-back, count=1
>>  >>  > reg04: base=0x120000000 (4608MB), size= 128MB: write-back, count=1
>>  >>  > reg05: base=0x128000000 (4736MB), size=  64MB: write-back, count=1
>>  >
>>  >
>>  > after 256M chunk size got
>>  >>  >>> [    0.000000] Setting variable MTRR 0, base: 0MB, range: 2048MB, type WB
>>  >>  >>> [    0.000000] Setting variable MTRR 1, base: 2048MB, range: 1024MB, type WB
>>  >>  >>> [    0.000000] Setting variable MTRR 2, base: 3072MB, range: 256MB, type WB
>>  >>  >>> [    0.000000] Setting variable MTRR 3, base: 3320MB, range: 8MB, type WB
>>  >>  >>> [    0.000000] Setting variable MTRR 4, base: 4096MB, range: 512MB, type WB
>>  >>  >>> [    0.000000] Setting variable MTRR 5, base: 4608MB, range: 256MB, type WB
>>  >>  >>> [    0.000000] Setting variable MTRR 6, base: 4800MB, range: 64MB, type UC
>>  >
>>  > so the convering is right..., need to spare another entry for your card.
>>  >
>>  > or we can dumping the
>>  >>  >>> [    0.000000] Setting variable MTRR 3, base: 3320MB, range: 8MB, type WB
>>  > for extra entra...
>>  >
>>  > but the mtrr trimming code need to be updated instead of only using highest_pfn
>>  >
>>  > YH
>>  >
> 
> please try to test patch with mtrr_chunk_size= 2g; 1g, 512m, 128m. etc.
> only for test: i comment out the fill_var_state..

There are the dmesg's , down to 2m and without chunk_size :

http://frugalware.org/~crazy/mtrr/mtrr/

> 
> YH
> 

Gabriel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ