[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48177D70.5010803@aknet.ru>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 23:56:32 +0400
From: Stas Sergeev <stsp@...et.ru>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
CC: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
Linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@...e.cz>,
Michael Opdenacker <michael@...e-electrons.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [patch] pcspkr: fix dependancies
Hello.
Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> If you google you will find a long thread about this patch.
Yes, indeed, thankyou.
http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-kernel/2008/1/17/577151
> It is all about saving memory for embedded platforms.
OK. This wasn't clear from the log
message for some reason, but it is
said in the above thread.
> No need to have the driver if there is no speaker on the board.
Very probably, and for that case I
made the patch like this:
http://uwsg.ucs.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0804.3/1189.html
> Ask Michael (author) if you need more info.
Reading the thread, it actually seems
like Michael wanted to submit the patch
much like the aforementioned one of
mine:
http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-kernel/2008/1/18/580583
but haven't done so in time, and as the
result, the wrong one stuck in.
But this is never too late to correct, I
hope.
So I see 2 options: either revert the
patch completely, or revert the dependancies
like Michael suggested initially (if I
understand his suggestion right).
Both patches are here, in this thread.
Thoughts?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists