[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4818205B.7050202@free-electrons.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 09:31:39 +0200
From: Michael Opdenacker <michael-lists@...e-electrons.com>
To: Stas Sergeev <stsp@...et.ru>
CC: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
Linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@...e.cz>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-tiny <Linux-tiny@...enic.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] pcspkr: fix dependancies
On 04/29/2008 09:56 PM, Stas Sergeev wrote:
> Reading the thread, it actually seems
> like Michael wanted to submit the patch
> much like the aforementioned one of
> mine:
> http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-kernel/2008/1/18/580583
> but haven't done so in time, and as the
> result, the wrong one stuck in.
> But this is never too late to correct, I
> hope.
>
> So I see 2 options: either revert the
> patch completely, or revert the dependancies
> like Michael suggested initially (if I
> understand his suggestion right).
> Both patches are here, in this thread.
> Thoughts?
>
>
Stas, Dmitry,
I agree with you... on a regular system, all the platform devices should
be enumerated, even if we don't use their drivers. It's only for use in
embedded devices (CONFIG_EMBEDDED) that we could omit this enumeration
to reduce kernel size.
Would you post a patch doing this?
Thank you,
:-)
Michael.
--
Michael Opdenacker, Free Electrons
Free Embedded Linux Training Materials
on http://free-electrons.com/training
(More than 1500 pages!)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists