[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080501214138.GT29330@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi>
Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 00:41:38 +0300
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
To: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lucho@...kov.net, ericvh@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix flags length in net 9p
On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 02:26:00PM -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2008-05-01 at 14:19 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Thu, 1 May 2008 17:08:05 -0400 (EDT)
> > Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Some files in the net/9p directory uses "int" for flags. This can
> > > cause hard to find bugs on some architectures. This patch converts the
> > > flags to use "long" instead.
> >
> > gargh.
> >
> > > This bug was discovered by doing an allyesconfig make on the -rt kernel
> > > where checks are done to ensure all flags are of size sizeof(long).
> >
> > I was about to suggest that we do something like that...
> >
> > I wonder how messy it is. I long ago lost the ability to follow the
> > convolutions in include/linux/spinlock*.h :( gotta patch?
>
> The check that's in -rt for this uses BUILD_BUG_ON(), and it's extremely
> cryptic when there is a failure .. Most people will be baffled why the
> build stopped. If a check went into mainline it should at least give you
> some sort of idea what's happening ..
A cryptic compile error is _much_ better than a hard to find runtime
error.
> Daniel
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists