[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0805011743180.12785@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 1 May 2008 17:46:57 -0400 (EDT)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
cc: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, lucho@...kov.net,
ericvh@...il.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix flags length in net 9p
On Fri, 2 May 2008, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> >
> > The check that's in -rt for this uses BUILD_BUG_ON(), and it's extremely
> > cryptic when there is a failure .. Most people will be baffled why the
> > build stopped. If a check went into mainline it should at least give you
> > some sort of idea what's happening ..
>
> One comment near BUILD_BUG_ON is enough (and everything we can do).
You might want to put a few comments by spinlock functions too, since I
hit this bug in the -rt patch and it confused my for about 10 minutes. Of
course I first blamed my own work on the spinlocks before I noticed that
the caller was using "int".
But actually, I like the idea of having a irqflags_t type that must be
used.
struct irqflags_s {
unsigned long flags;
};
typedef struct irqflags_s irqflags_t;
This would force everyone to use this structure, and it would be an easy
script to create to do a the cross the board conversion. The only problems
would be where someone didn't use "flags" as the name, but that can be
fixed as well.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists