lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 01 May 2008 14:49:10 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
CC:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Gabriel C <nix.or.die@...glemail.com>,
	Mika Fischer <mika.fischer@...pnet.de>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: mtrr cleanup for converting continuous to discrete
 - auto detect v2

Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>>
>>  That's not the point.  I understand you want to flatten the layout.  The
>> point is: why do you need manual tunables for the algorithm to do the right
>> thing?
> 
> optimal result is not losing covering for ranges that is originally
> covered, and still keep as many of spare mtrr entries for X server
> driver.
> we only have 8 mtrrs, could lose some covering because of run out of mtrr regs.
> So we need to search it according to chunk/gran with ram ranges that
> is defined by old mtrr layout.

Yes.  You have a search space of less than 1000 possible combinations 
(64..20 bits), so it hardly is any reason to not search the entire 
universe of possibilities, even if by exhaustive search.

Now, if even that searching can't come up with the optimal solution (if 
one exists) in all cases, then the algorithm is broken.

> and if we can not find the optimal setting, user could select one
> setting (chunk/gran size) to boot next time, but he will lose some
> covering.
> for some regions. later trim_mtrr will remove those range from e820 map

Right, now we're talking policy, which obviously has to be entered by 
the user.

	-hpa

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ