linux-kernel - Re: Ingo, no more kconfig patches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080501025234.GE27574@elte.hu>
Date:	Thu, 1 May 2008 04:52:34 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
Cc:	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Ingo, no more kconfig patches

* Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org> wrote:

> I would really appreciate it if you could send the error message and 
> the .config but not quick kconfig patches that are often wrong and 
> that you try to push through the maintainers as you tried here.

hey, sorry about invading your turf of trivial patches ;) I dont see it 
as a problem that the thought process and the initial patch is 
incomplete and ad-hoc. My preference is to work with people out in the 
open, even on trivial issues. Dmitry is a capable maintainer who 
understands his code very well and he'll resist me if i'm full of it. 
Just like i resisted you when you were full of it. That's what 
maintainers do, their job is to know their code.

And, occasionally, as in this case, i might end up being faced with a 
bug in the code i maintain ;)

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/