linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] add typecheck on irqsave and friends for correct flags

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0805012114180.31096@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date:	Thu, 1 May 2008 21:16:48 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, peterz@...radead.org,
	hch@...radead.org, adobriyan@...il.com, bunk@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] add typecheck on irqsave and friends for correct flags


On Thu, 1 May 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > This patch adds a typecheck inside the irqsave and restore functions
> > to flag these cases.
>
> hm, not exactly a thing of beauty, but it could have been worse.

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
 (a mother always thinks their kid is beautiful ;-).

>
>
> If we had implemeted these things properly, as
>
> 	unsigned long spin_lock_irqsave(spinlock_t *lock);

Then we would have been forced to do the

	irqflags_t spin_lock_irqsave(spinlock_t *lock);

trick. Which would probably be the better long term solution, but the
biggest PITA for you in the short term.

-- Steve

>
> then we wouldn't be able to do this at all.
>
> Oh well, thanks, I'll toss it in there.  Maybe this should go into
> git-sched (aka git-omnibus)?
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/