linux-kernel - RE: Sharing disks amoung multiple software RAIDs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 2 May 2008 17:44:18 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Alex Davis <alex14641@...oo.com>
To:	Kasper Sandberg <lkml@...anurb.dk>,
	David Greaves <david@...eaves.com>,
	David Lethe <david@...tools.com>
Cc:	David Rees <drees76@...il.com>,
	Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@...idpixels.com>,
	linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: RE: Sharing disks amoung multiple software RAIDs



I code, therefore I am


--- On Fri, 5/2/08, David Lethe <david@...tools.com> wrote:
[snipped]
> I was being too literal. md is a good solution (I use it
> myself).  However, the OP wanted to "Make sure that if
> one disk dies, the data is still in tact".  
I was also concerned about performance. It seems that if the RAIDs will 
be used heavily and independent of each other, and performance is a 
concern, then dedicated disks (and possibly dedicated controllers)
are the better option.


      ____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and 
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/