linux-kernel - Re: i387/FPU init issues...

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1209822784.6972.45.camel@localhost>
Date:	Sat, 03 May 2008 09:53:04 -0400
From:	jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>
To:	James Courtier-Dutton <James@...erbug.co.uk>
Cc:	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: i387/FPU init issues...

On Sat, 2008-03-05 at 11:57 +0100, James Courtier-Dutton wrote:

> > The only thing that has changed there compared to good version is the
> > last two lines. But that looks sane to me given the struct naming has
> > changed. So i am suspecting the calling path perhaps not setting
> > something or other.
> >
> >   
> My guess would be that the jnc 1f is now wrong.

Do elucidate. The instruction with jnc 1f has always been there.
Is there something as a result of the compiler or the codepath that
makes it now wrong?

cheers,
jamal

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/