[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080503141409.GC3986@hack>
Date: Sat, 3 May 2008 22:14:24 +0800
From: WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [Patch] fs/binfmt_elf.c: fix wrong return values
When strnlen_user() fails, return 0 is suspecious.
What's more, the caller returns 0 on success, so that logic is
obviously wrong.
I am not sure if returning -EINVAL is good enough. I think it's
better than -EFAULT here.
NOTE: This patch is _not_ tested yet!
Signed-off-by: WANG Cong <wangcong@...ux.org>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
---
fs/binfmt_elf.c | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/binfmt_elf.c b/fs/binfmt_elf.c
index 43254e3..10f9642 100644
--- a/fs/binfmt_elf.c
+++ b/fs/binfmt_elf.c
@@ -256,7 +256,7 @@ create_elf_tables(struct linux_binprm *bprm, struct elfhdr *exec,
return -EFAULT;
len = strnlen_user((void __user *)p, MAX_ARG_STRLEN);
if (!len || len > MAX_ARG_STRLEN)
- return 0;
+ return -EINVAL;
p += len;
}
if (__put_user(0, argv))
@@ -268,7 +268,7 @@ create_elf_tables(struct linux_binprm *bprm, struct elfhdr *exec,
return -EFAULT;
len = strnlen_user((void __user *)p, MAX_ARG_STRLEN);
if (!len || len > MAX_ARG_STRLEN)
- return 0;
+ return -EINVAL;
p += len;
}
if (__put_user(0, envp))
--
1.5.4.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists