[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080504193234.GB23846@uranus.ravnborg.org>
Date: Sun, 4 May 2008 21:32:34 +0200
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To: Rene Herman <rene.herman@...il.com>
Cc: Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>,
linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: kconfig - a suggestion how to fix the select issue
On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 09:28:54PM +0200, Rene Herman wrote:
> On 04-05-08 09:10, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>
> >Today we have two ways to express/solve dependencies.
> >
> >Top-down we have "depends on"
> >and bottom up we have "select".
> >
> >The "depends on" dependencies at the same
> >time impact the visibility of a symbol.
> >A symbol with "depends on" not satisfied are not
> >visible and thus not shown in menuconfig.
>
> I've always really disliked the visibility thing. I believe it's not really
> the core issue here but regardless of anything else, could we not "grey
> out" non-selectable options with its helpt text still available? That's
> much more the standard UI paradigm.
Works in xconfig - but last I tried I failed to enable it in menuconfig.
It should be doable I just failed to see how.
And as my linux time-share for this month is already almost consumed
I will not find time to look at it :-(
Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists