[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <481E0E76.3060900@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 04 May 2008 21:28:54 +0200
From: Rene Herman <rene.herman@...il.com>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
CC: Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>,
linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: kconfig - a suggestion how to fix the select issue
On 04-05-08 09:10, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> Today we have two ways to express/solve dependencies.
>
> Top-down we have "depends on"
> and bottom up we have "select".
>
> The "depends on" dependencies at the same
> time impact the visibility of a symbol.
> A symbol with "depends on" not satisfied are not
> visible and thus not shown in menuconfig.
I've always really disliked the visibility thing. I believe it's not really
the core issue here but regardless of anything else, could we not "grey out"
non-selectable options with its helpt text still available? That's much more
the standard UI paradigm.
Rene.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists