[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0805032323580.27385@twinlark.arctic.org>
Date: Sat, 3 May 2008 23:25:27 -0700 (PDT)
From: dean gaudet <dean@...tic.org>
To: Sebastian Siewior <linux-crypto@...breakpoint.cc>
cc: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"Adam J. Richter" <adam@...drasil.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...e.hu, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm crypto] AES: x86_64 asm implementation optimization
one of the more important details in evaluating these changes would be the
family/model/stepping of the processors being microbenchmarked... could
you folks include /proc/cpuinfo with the results?
also -- please drop the #define for R16 to %rsp ... it obfuscates more
than it helps anything.
thanks
-dean
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008, Sebastian Siewior wrote:
> * Huang, Ying | 2008-04-25 11:11:17 [+0800]:
>
> >Hi, Sebastian,
> Hi Huang,
>
> sorry for the delay.
>
> >I changed the patches to group the read or write together instead of
> >interleaving. Can you help me to test these new patches? The new patches
> >is attached with the mail.
> The new results are attached.
>
> >
> >Best Regards,
> >Huang Ying
>
> Sebastian
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists