[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1210137134.4676.1.camel@caritas-dev.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 07 May 2008 13:12:14 +0800
From: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
To: dean gaudet <dean@...tic.org>
Cc: Sebastian Siewior <linux-crypto@...breakpoint.cc>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"Adam J. Richter" <adam@...drasil.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...e.hu, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm crypto] AES: x86_64 asm implementation optimization
Hi,
On Sat, 2008-05-03 at 23:25 -0700, dean gaudet wrote:
> one of the more important details in evaluating these changes would be the
> family/model/stepping of the processors being microbenchmarked... could
> you folks include /proc/cpuinfo with the results?
The file attached is /proc/cpuinfo of my testing machine.
Best Regards,
Huang Ying
> also -- please drop the #define for R16 to %rsp ... it obfuscates more
> than it helps anything.
>
> thanks
> -dean
>
> On Wed, 30 Apr 2008, Sebastian Siewior wrote:
>
> > * Huang, Ying | 2008-04-25 11:11:17 [+0800]:
> >
> > >Hi, Sebastian,
> > Hi Huang,
> >
> > sorry for the delay.
> >
> > >I changed the patches to group the read or write together instead of
> > >interleaving. Can you help me to test these new patches? The new patches
> > >is attached with the mail.
> > The new results are attached.
> >
> > >
> > >Best Regards,
> > >Huang Ying
> >
> > Sebastian
> >
View attachment "cpuinfo" of type "text/plain" (1374 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists