linux-kernel - Re: MAP_POPULATE behavior change?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 5 May 2008 14:42:44 +0200
From:	"Michael Kerrisk" <mtk.manpages@...glemail.com>
To:	"Nick Piggin" <npiggin@...e.de>
Cc:	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, mk <michael.kerrisk@...il.com>
Subject: Re: MAP_POPULATE behavior change?

Hi Nick,

On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 2:23 PM, Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 02:07:17PM +0200, Michael Kerrisk wrote:

> > In 2.6.23, you had the commit below, which seems to have changed the
> > kernel-userland API.
> >
> > Am I right to understand that with this patch MAP_POPULATE now also works with
> > MAP_PRIVATE mappings?  (Formerly it only worked with MAP_SHARED mappings, but
> > some very quick testing suggests that MAP_POPULATE now also has an affect for
> > MAP_PRIVATE.)
>
> Yeah it should also set up anonymous mappings. Very observant :)

Umm -- did it not work for anonymous *shared* mappings before?  I
understood that it did.

> > Also, can you summarize the status of MAP_NONBLOCK?  Is it now a no-op?
>
> Yes, it is.

Hmm -- going back and re-reading the code, there is:

        if ((flags & MAP_POPULATE) && !(flags & MAP_NONBLOCK))
                make_pages_present(addr, addr + len);

That means that MAP_NONBLOCK makes *MAP_POPULATE* a no-op.  Was that intended?

Cheers,

Michael

> The problem is you need to walk the page tables, and it
> is fairly annoying to have to make a special case for that to be
> non blocking (after just getting rid of the ->populate special case).
>
> It is possible of course to implement. It might even be easier because
> you could pass in a NONBLOCK flag to ->fault from get_user_pages... but
> for now it is a noop.
>
> Thanks,
> Nick
>
>
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Michael
> >
> > ==
> >
> > commit 54cb8821de07f2ffcd28c380ce9b93d5784b40d7
> > Author: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
> > Date:   Thu Jul 19 01:46:59 2007 -0700
> >
> >     mm: merge populate and nopage into fault (fixes nonlinear)
> >
> >     Nonlinear mappings are (AFAIKS) simply a virtual memory concept that encodes
> >     the virtual address -> file offset differently from linear mappings.
> >
> >     ->populate is a layering violation because the filesystem/pagecache code
> >     should need to know anything about the virtual memory mapping.  The hitch here
> >     is that the ->nopage handler didn't pass down enough information (ie.  pgoff).
> >      But it is more logical to pass pgoff rather than have the ->nopage function
> >     calculate it itself anyway (because that's a similar layering violation).
> >
> >     Having the populate handler install the pte itself is likewise a nasty thing
> >     to be doing.
> >
> >     This patch introduces a new fault handler that replaces ->nopage and
> >     ->populate and (later) ->nopfn.  Most of the old mechanism is still in place
> >     so there is a lot of duplication and nice cleanups that can be removed if
> >     everyone switches over.
> >
> >     The rationale for doing this in the first place is that nonlinear mappings are
> >     subject to the pagefault vs invalidate/truncate race too, and it seemed stupid
> >     to duplicate the synchronisation logic rather than just consolidate the two.
> >
> >     After this patch, MAP_NONBLOCK no longer sets up ptes for pages present in
> >     pagecache.  Seems like a fringe functionality anyway.
> >
> >     NOPAGE_REFAULT is removed.  This should be implemented with ->fault, and no
> >     users have hit mainline yet.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Michael Kerrisk
> > Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
> > Found a bug? http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/reporting_bugs.html
> >
>



-- 
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Found a bug? http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/reporting_bugs.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/